The good voters of Cuyahoga County have been asked to renew a “sin tax” to fund “maintenance” expenses at stadiums located in Cleveland. I think it’s fair to assert that: 1) this is a controversial proposal, and 2) of multiple reasons for that controversy, one of the most prominent is the issue of whether or not stadium funding counts as a taxpayer giveaway to affluent professional sports franchises.
Critics argue forcefully that it is. Backers, including the Greater Cleveland Partnership and Northeast Ohio Media Group, have argued throughout the campaign that it is not. The latter reported the GCP stating that “FirstEnergy Stadium, Quicken Loans Arena and Progressive Field, are ultimately owned by taxpayers…” Followed by a quote from Councilman Jack Schron that “This is not the teams’ property we’re protecting. It’s our property.”
Schron and other renewal proponents seem, so far as I know, to have literal fact on their side. The argument that “this is public money going to public property” seems, nonetheless, like it’s meeting resistance; as a designer, I would like to suggest that contrary visual messages may be a large part of the reason.
Let’s have a look at the stadiums in question. What do you see?
I signed up to review portfolios yet again, after all, so I’ll be doing that from 11-1 on Friday, April 11. (Sign up here if you want to join me, either as reviewer or reviewee.) I see that this session is the first to sell out, so at least there will presumably be no shortage of students.
After much prevarication, I finally decided to go through with this again largely because I concluded that, by proxy, it’s the equivalent of people coming to me and asking for advice and help. I did not feel quite to the point of saying “no, go away.” (Yet.)
That, plus boredom. Things have been a bit quiet around here of late, and while spring is on the way it’s hardly sit-on-the-balcony or go-enjoy-the-park weather. I did make use of the time to complete the first draft of my second book, for anyone interested.
Meanwhile, I’ve decided that I will at least try to get something for myself out of this year’s portfolio review: I am just going to go for broke and ask about these inexplicable web site splash pages that they all show up with. Again, iirc these mostly went out of fashion when these students were like seven years old. Maybe in pouncing on this I’ll risk seeming even more like Old Weird Guy, but 1) do I care that much? and 2) if it vexes me it might conceivably vex people interviewing them for actual jobs, so perhaps best to prepare them.
Mostly, though, I’m just curious to confirm or deny my theory of out of date professors/assignments that badly need helped into the 21st century.
Right around four years ago, I published a little diversionary project titled The Great Lakewood Pub Crawl Map. This was, in essence, a guide to our fair city’s two bar-lined (roughly) parallel commercial thoroughfares, Madison and Detroit Avenues. Visually, it also belongs in at least a loose sense to the popular if increasingly tired “fantasy transit map” genre, in that I was inspired by the image of stops on a subway or streetcar line.
Once upon a time, of course, these were streetcar lines; though long since eliminated in favor of (sometimes spotty) bus service, that detail aside Lakewood basically is the classic definition of a “streetcar suburb.”
I bring all of this up, today, because (dammit, I’ve buried the lead again haven’t I?) of an unexpected new relevance: apparently, the city of Lakewood is considering bringing back “trolley” service on these streets, largely motivated by their popularity as linear drinking emporia.
Even in these days of semiretirement, I continue to find value in occasional visits to warrenellis.com. This recent post, “IndieWeb,” serves as yet another example.
Apparently, there is now a thing (project? campaign?) dubbed IndieWeb. It’s difficult to explain in part because it’s difficult to grasp, but the first line of content at indiewebcamp.com probably summarizes the idea as well as anything I have found: “The IndieWeb is a people-focused alternative to the ‘corporate web’.”
I think further thoughts are going to require a scattershot approach…
…not least because, again, this all seems complicated and opaque once you try to delve beyond one-sentence summaries. The web site itself is a perfect demonstration of why this concept, and so many similar open/independent programs, will probably remain niche alternatives to the “corporate web.” Basically every page, to say nothing of the whole, seems to be begging for that catchall dismissal: “TL;DR.” (And, for older generations, “MEGO,” which is definitely a big part of my reaction.)
Also, is it just me or does “IndieWeb” sound incredibly 1990s? Personally I’m just fine with that; I have no idea how it plays to other audiences. Maybe younger adults are now too young even to notice.
In any event, like Ellis, I find this interesting all the same. A number of factors have, over the past year, been enhancing my appreciation for open, user-community controlled tools, and sharpening my distrust of what Bruce Sterling has called “the stacks.” read more…
A little note for the record about yet another of life’s little misadventures, which played out over the past couple of months.
When I elected to buy a Mac Mini, as-noted previously this meant buying a standalone display for the first time since 2002. Since when technology has changed a lot, but the basic problem that worried me a dozen years ago hasn’t: as much as any typical gadget there is, a desktop display is something that it would be very helpful to examine in-person before buying, but this has never been a very practical option and certainly isn’t in the context of modern retailing.
So I made do with reviews and buying guides, studied hard, prepared a detailed spreadsheet, and finally settled on a ViewSonic model… which seemed to be out of stock everywhere. The “manufacturer” did take my order… then several hours later realized that they were also out of stock, and, owing one presumes to poor supply-chain/contractor management, wouldn’t be in-stock for weeks if not longer.
So I tried again, and purchased a highly-rated display with the IPS technology that is apparently the new hotness and an absolute must… and after weeks of fighting with settings, finally had to write it off as unworkable. Wacked colors, terrible terrible banding and hard edges in gradients, and absolutely zero help whatsoever from the alleged customer support options.
So, crowdsourced wisdom having dismally failed, I decided to try a different approach and seek out some expertise. And here I will name names, because I can give some credit. Small Dog Electronics of Vermont not only has cute branding, but genuinely helpful people (or at any rate one of them) who gave some thought to my needs and provided personal recommendations. I researched all of them anyway, and finally settled on another ViewSonic product; I wasn’t best pleased about giving them another chance after the way this whole fiasco began, but at this point a practical solution took precedence.
I rate Ni No Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch for Playstation a 9.6/10.
Beyond that, where to begin…
It has been just one week shy of a year since I declared my interest in this game, and intent to play it some day. About… five weeks since I received my secondhand PS3 and began playing. And about one week since I began the final stage of the game. Which was an absolutely shocking spike in difficulty compared with the other 95% of the game.
It’s strange that I’ve been around long enough that I can completely forget about some things, even since I’ve been working as a professional. Recently, an occasional client reminded me of a small project I worked on a good five years ago, that had completely slipped my mind: a logo design for a general-purpose virtual board game application called VASSAL.
This is still in use, which by itself seems surprising; as is typical in graphic design, much of my work is ephemeral, and volunteer projects like this can easily dry up and blow away. But the project is still going strong, apparently. And this design is still in use.
It has a bit of a clunky character seen by itself, in a large format, but I recall that our emphasis was making an effective icon in small formats. And I think that still works; if you visit the site, I think it makes for a splendid little icon in browser location bars and tabs. And, best of all, my client remains very pleased.
Twenty-thirteen has been, if nothing else, a very big surprise year when reviewed from December. Through 10, even 12 months of this year, it seemed like an average year at best, and frequently like one characterized by disappointment and frustration.
And yet, when I got to the end of the year, I not only received a few pieces of unexpected good news but also concluded that, looking back at the big picture of the year, it has actually been good and even great for me. Also, I find that I have done quite well in accomplishing my agenda from last January.
In the bigger big picture, well… you can read about that elsewhere. For me, though, I did, created or experienced the following memorable things…
- Learned my way around (one) ebook format, as part of publishing my own book.
- Another nanosecond of internet fame, as Richard Florida considered a question from me (and the fate of megacity-less states) at The Atlantic Cities.
- Documented the design of my well-received 2012 year-end card.
- Did I mention I published my first book?